Computer Simulation in Chemical Physics by D. J. Tildesley (auth.), M. P. Allen, D. J. Tildesley (eds.)
By D. J. Tildesley (auth.), M. P. Allen, D. J. Tildesley (eds.)
Computer Simulation in Chemical Physics comprises the lawsuits of a NATO complex learn Institute held at CORISA, Alghero, Sardinia, in September 1992. within the 5 years that experience elapsed because the box was once final summarized there were a couple of striking advances that have considerably extended the scope of the equipment. solid examples are the Car--Parrinello process, which permits the examine of fabrics with itinerant electrons; the Gibbs procedure for the direct simulation of liquid--vapor section equilibria; the move of scaling techniques from simulations of spin versions to extra advanced platforms; and the improvement of the configurational--biased Monte-Carlo equipment for learning dense polymers. the sector has additionally been prompted by way of an incredible raise in on hand computing energy and the supply of latest software.
a lot of these fascinating advancements, an extra, are mentioned in an available manner the following, making the e-book crucial interpreting for graduate scholars and examine scientists in either educational and commercial settings.
Read or Download Computer Simulation in Chemical Physics PDF
Similar chemical books
Additional resources for Computer Simulation in Chemical Physics
Example text
25] J. I. SIEPMANN and D. FRENKEL, Molec. PhY$. 75,59 (1992). [26] M. N. ROSENBLUTH and A. W. ROSENBLUTH, J. Chern. PhY$. 23,356 (1955). [27] J. I. SIEPMANN, Molec. PhY$. 70,1145 (1990). [28] D. FRENKEL, G. C. A. M. MOOIJ, and B. SMIT, J. PhY$. Condo Mat. 4,3053 (1992). [29] L. R. DODD, T. D. BOONE, and D. N. THEODOROU, Molec. PhY$. (1993), accepted for publication. [30] N. MEAL and A. D. SOKAL, J. Stat. PhY$. 50, 109 (1988). [31] J. P. FREIRE and A. HORTA, J. Chern. PhY$. 65, 4049 (1976). [32] S.
BAUMGARTNER [23] F. T. WALL and K. BINDER, J. Chern. PhY$. 71, 2541 (1979). and F. MANDEL, J. Chern. PhY$. 63, 4592 (1975). [24] M. BISHOP, D. CEPERLEY, H. L. FRISCH, and M. H. KALOS, J. Chern. PhY$. 72, 3228 (1980). [25] J. I. SIEPMANN and D. FRENKEL, Molec. PhY$. 75,59 (1992). [26] M. N. ROSENBLUTH and A. W. ROSENBLUTH, J. Chern. PhY$. 23,356 (1955). [27] J. I. SIEPMANN, Molec. PhY$. 70,1145 (1990). [28] D. FRENKEL, G. C. A. M. MOOIJ, and B. SMIT, J. PhY$. Condo Mat. 4,3053 (1992). [29] L. R.
P. Computer Simulation in Chemical Physics. 23-47. © 1993 Kluwer Academic Publishers. 24 where mi is the mass of atom i and f i is the force on the atom. These 3N equations of motion are coupled since f i depends on the positions of all of the atoms in the system through the gradient of the potential. fi = -oV/ ori . / Oqi . (5) The generalized coordinates and their conjugate momenta define a hamiltonian, which can be used to obtain two first-order equations of motion [1]. For a system of atoms these are pi/mi -oV/ ori .